Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
A Systematic Review on Machine Learning Techniques for Survival Analysis in Cancer
3
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) offers opportunities to overcome limitations of conventional survival analyses, which are commonly found in cancer studies. However, the choice and levels of performance of ML methods vary across studies. As a result, it is unclear whether they consistently outperform traditional statistical methods and whether one particular ML strategy may outperform others for survival analysis. The present study aimed to systematically review the literature around this emerging topic. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases were systematically searched using keywords related to Machine Learning, Survival Analysis and Cancer. RESULTS & CONCLUSION: The review included 196 studies, from which 39 comparable studies were used for the analysis. Improved predictive performance was seen from the use of ML in almost all cancer types. Predictive performance of the different ML methods varied across cancer types, and multi-task and deep learning methods appeared to yield superior performance; however, it was reported in only a minority of papers. This study also highlighted great variability in both methodologies and their implementations.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
1987 · 16.123 Zit.
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 14.099 Zit.
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
2011 · 10.912 Zit.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
2010 · 9.149 Zit.
UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation
2018 · 8.832 Zit.