Daniele Fanelli

Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys

2014 · 131 Zit. · Science and Engineering Ethics

Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications

2018 · 60 Zit. · Science and Engineering Ethics

Doing the Right Thing: A Qualitative Investigation of Retractions Due to Unintentional Error

2017 · 52 Zit. · Science and Engineering Ethics

What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses

2021 · 50 Zit. · Accountability in Research

Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: ways to minimise inappropriate citation and use of retracted data

2023 · 20 Zit. · BMJ evidence-based medicine

Why do scientists fabricate and falsify data? A matched-control analysis of papers containing problematic image duplications

2017 · 13 Zit. · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

What difference do retractions make? An estimate of the epistemic impact of retractions on recent meta-analyses

2019 · 11 Zit. · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

We need more research on causes and consequences, as well as on solutions

2014 · 10 Zit. · Addiction

Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: Ways to minimize inappropriate citation and use of retracted data

2022 · 1 Zit.

Behind the scenes of scientific fraud <b>Inside An Academic Scandal</b> <i>Max H. Bazerman</i> MIT Press, 2025. 200 pp.

2025 · 0 Zit. · Science