Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
6.580
Zitationen
11
Autoren
2017
Jahr
Abstract
Compared to usual care across a wide variety of decision contexts, people exposed to decision aids feel more knowledgeable, better informed, and clearer about their values, and they probably have a more active role in decision making and more accurate risk perceptions. There is growing evidence that decision aids may improve values-congruent choices. There are no adverse effects on health outcomes or satisfaction. New for this updated is evidence indicating improved knowledge and accurate risk perceptions when decision aids are used either within or in preparation for the consultation. Further research is needed on the effects on adherence with the chosen option, cost-effectiveness, and use with lower literacy populations.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?
1999 · 6.635 Zit.
Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice
2012 · 4.096 Zit.
Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)
1997 · 4.082 Zit.
Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review.
1995 · 4.075 Zit.
Shared Decision Making — The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care
2012 · 3.364 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
- Ottawa Hospital(CA)
- University of Ottawa(CA)
- The Quebec Population Health Research Network(CA)
- Université Laval(CA)
- Health Decisions (United States)(US)
- Oregon Health & Science University(US)
- Michigan State University(US)
- Dartmouth College(US)
- Newcastle University(GB)
- University of Sydney(AU)