Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Reply to “Likelihood of False-Positive Results in High-Impact Journals Publishing Groundbreaking Research”
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2012
Jahr
Abstract
We thank Drs. Agrawal and Sharma for their thoughtful letter, which suggests that papers in journals with high-impact factors are more likely to be retracted because they have a higher prior probability of being false as a consequence of their novelty. This is a good point, and we concur with the
Ähnliche Arbeiten
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
2022 · 2.691 Zit.
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
1998 · 2.498 Zit.
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
2012 · 2.309 Zit.
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
2009 · 1.922 Zit.
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
2023 · 1.802 Zit.