Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?
226
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2008
Jahr
Abstract
Editors should not assume that reviewers will detect most major errors, particularly those concerned with the context of study. Short training packages have only a slight impact on improving error detection.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note
1997 · 14.665 Zit.
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
2011 · 13.992 Zit.
QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
2011 · 13.741 Zit.
A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions
1981 · 11.525 Zit.
Clarifying Confusion: The Confusion Assessment Method
1990 · 5.247 Zit.