Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
61.652
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2003
Jahr
Abstract
Paper from the BMJ by Higgins J. P. T. et al \nCochrane Reviews have recently started including the quantity I 2 to help readers assess the \nconsistency of the results of studies in meta-analyses. What does this new quantity mean, and why is \nassessment of heterogeneity so important to clinical practice?
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 86.337 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.855 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.141 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.966 Zit.
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
1997 · 55.137 Zit.