Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Prioritizing Clinical Information System Project Risk Factors: A Delphi Study
26
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2008
Jahr
Abstract
Identifying the risks associated with the implementation of clinical information systems (CIS) in health care organizations can be a major challenge for managers, clinicians, and IT specialists, as there are numerous ways in which they can be described and categorized. Risks vary in nature, severity, and consequence, so it is important that those considered to be high-level risks be identified, understood, and managed. This study addresses this issue by first reviewing the extant literature on IT/CIS project risks, and second conducting a Delphi survey among 21 experts highly involved in CIS projects in Canada. In addition to providing a comprehensive list of risk factors and their relative importance, this study is helpful in unifying the literature on IT implementation and health informatics. Our risk factor-oriented research actually confirmed many of the factors found to be important in both these streams.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 87.674 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.951 Zit.
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
2018 · 38.028 Zit.
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
2019 · 28.991 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
2015 · 26.091 Zit.