Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory
491
Zitationen
1
Autoren
1994
Jahr
Abstract
What makes an argument in a law case good or bad? Can legal decisions be justified by purely rational argument or are they ultimately determined by more subjective influences? These questions are central to the study of jurisprudence, and are thoroughly and critically examined in Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory, now with a new and up-to-date foreword. Its clarity of explanation and argument make this classic legal text readily accessible to lawyers, philosophers, and any general reader interested in legal processes, human reasoning, or practical logic.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Between Facts and Norms
1996 · 4.121 Zit.
The Concept of Law
1961 · 3.630 Zit.
Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy
1997 · 3.603 Zit.
Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda
2004 · 3.055 Zit.
Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change
1974 · 2.753 Zit.