Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
INFORMED CONSENT STATUS IN OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES WITH RETROSPECTIVE DESIGN: A POOR SHOW
1
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2017
Jahr
Abstract
ABSTRACTObjective: Informed consent is very important to protect the rights of patients and is obtained as a vital component of any clinical study. Requirementof patient consent in retrospective research continues to stir controversy even today. Some of directions of regulatory authorities even waive off theconsent for retrospective studies, whereas few recommend that at least clearance from the Ethical Review Board may be taken or information topatient may be given or oral consent must be given by patient for usage of the data in any retrospective study. The aim of this study was to analyze thecurrent status of informed consent procedures in observational studies with retrospective design.Methods: This review was intended to find out the current status of procedures involved in informed consent in India and abroad. A total of 100retrospective studies were searched for this objective from the internet and other literature sources.Results: Data show that in 65% of studies neither informed consent/oral consent nor ethical clearance was taken. Only 1% of studies have beenconducted with informed consent as well as ethical clearance. Only 14% of studies were conducted with informed consent and 21% with ethicalapproval.Conclusion: The study reflects very poor status of informed consent in retrospective studies and noncompliance of ICH guidelines for clinical researchin relation to informed consent.Keywords: Clinical research, Informed consent, Retrospective studies.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.819 Zit.
Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
2005 · 8.956 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 6.963 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.265 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.575 Zit.