Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance (QIBA) recommendations for improved precision of DWI and DCE‐MRI derived biomarkers in multicenter oncology trials
394
Zitationen
17
Autoren
2018
Jahr
Abstract
Physiological properties of tumors can be measured both in vivo and noninvasively by diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Although these techniques have been used for more than two decades to study tumor diffusion, perfusion, and/or permeability, the methods and studies on how to reduce measurement error and bias in the derived imaging metrics is still lacking in the literature. This is of paramount importance because the objective is to translate these quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) into clinical trials, and ultimately in clinical practice. Standardization of the image acquisition using appropriate phantoms is the first step from a technical performance standpoint. The next step is to assess whether the imaging metrics have clinical value and meet the requirements for being a QIB as defined by the Radiological Society of North America's Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA). The goal and mission of QIBA and the National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) initiatives are to provide technical performance standards (QIBA profiles) and QIN tools for producing reliable QIBs for use in the clinical imaging community. Some of QIBA's development of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced QIB profiles has been hampered by the lack of literature for repeatability and reproducibility of the derived QIBs. The available research on this topic is scant and is not in sync with improvements or upgrades in MRI technology over the years. This review focuses on the need for QIBs in oncology applications and emphasizes the importance of the assessment of their reproducibility and repeatability. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:e101-e121.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Index for rating diagnostic tests
1950 · 11.305 Zit.
3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network
2012 · 8.618 Zit.
Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype
2017 · 6.320 Zit.
MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging
1994 · 6.012 Zit.
Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images
1999 · 5.256 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center(US)
- Zero to Three(US)
- Cleveland Clinic(US)
- University of Michigan–Ann Arbor(US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center(US)
- Oregon Health & Science University(US)
- Advanced Imaging Research (United States)(US)
- University of California System(US)
- University of California, San Francisco(US)
- University of Southern California(US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham(US)
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre(CA)
- Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine(DE)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center(US)
- University of Pennsylvania(US)
- National Institute of Standards and Technology(US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison(US)