Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Governing AI‐Driven Health Research: Are IRBs Up to the Task?
49
Zitationen
13
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
Many are calling for concrete mechanisms of oversight for health research involving artificial intelligence (AI). In response, institutional review boards (IRBs) are being turned to as a familiar model of governance. Here, we examine the IRB model as a form of ethics oversight for health research that uses AI. We consider the model's origins, analyze the challenges IRBs are facing in the contexts of both industry and academia, and offer concrete recommendations for how these committees might be adapted in order to provide an effective mechanism of oversight for health-related AI research.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.822 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 7.012 Zit.
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
1995 · 5.586 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.435 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.809 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- McGill University(CA)
- IT University of Copenhagen(DK)
- Gonzaga University(US)
- Tilburg University(NL)
- University of Oxford(GB)
- Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris-Nord(FR)
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities(GB)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council(GB)
- University College London(GB)
- University of Edinburgh(GB)