Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?
89
Zitationen
16
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
We believe the oversight mechanism could benefit from these reforms because they will help to overcome data-intensive research challenges and consequently benefit research at large.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.819 Zit.
Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
2005 · 8.956 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 6.963 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.265 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.575 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- ETH Zurich(CH)
- University of Oxford(GB)
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities(GB)
- University of Edinburgh(GB)
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School(GB)
- McGill University(CA)
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics(US)
- The Geneva Association(CH)
- New York University(US)
- Human Longevity (United States)(US)
- King's College London(GB)
- Ghent University(BE)
- University of Geneva(CH)