Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Can medical algorithms be fair? Three ethical quandaries and one dilemma
25
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate what it takes to reconcile the idea of fairness in medical algorithms and machine learning (ML) with the broader discourse of fairness and health equality in health research. METHOD: The methodological approach used in this paper is theoretical and ethical analysis. RESULT: We show that the question of ensuring comprehensive ML fairness is interrelated to three quandaries and one dilemma. DISCUSSION: As fairness in ML depends on a nexus of inherent justice and fairness concerns embedded in health research, a comprehensive conceptualisation is called for to make the notion useful. CONCLUSION: This paper demonstrates that more analytical work is needed to conceptualise fairness in ML so it adequately reflects the complexity of justice and fairness concerns within the field of health research.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.687 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.591 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.114 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.867 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.