Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial intelligence and clinical deterioration
18
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an overview of the systems being used to identify and predict clinical deterioration in hospitalised patients, with focus on the current and future role of artificial intelligence (AI). RECENT FINDINGS: There are five leading AI driven systems in this field: the Advanced Alert Monitor (AAM), the electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (eCART) score, Hospital wide Alert Via Electronic Noticeboard, the Mayo Clinic Early Warning Score, and the Rothman Index (RI). Each uses Electronic Patient Record (EPR) data and machine learning to predict adverse events. Less mature but relevant evolutions are occurring in the fields of Natural Language Processing, Time and Motion Studies, AI Sepsis and COVID-19 algorithms. SUMMARY: Research-based AI-driven systems to predict clinical deterioration are increasingly being developed, but few are being implemented into clinical workflows. Escobar et al. (AAM) provide the current gold standard for robust model development and implementation methodology. Multiple technologies show promise, however, the pathway to meaningfully affect patient outcomes remains challenging.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)
2016 · 27.496 Zit.
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
2011 · 13.831 Zit.
APACHE II
1985 · 13.632 Zit.
Definitions for Sepsis and Organ Failure and Guidelines for the Use of Innovative Therapies in Sepsis
1992 · 13.188 Zit.
The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure
1996 · 11.534 Zit.