Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Scientific integrity and fraud in radiology research
17
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
Radiology researchers reported that scientific fraud and other undesirable practices such as publication bias and honorary authorship are relatively common. Their general confidence in the scientific integrity of published work was relatively high, but far from perfect. These data may trigger stakeholders in the radiology community to place scientific integrity higher on the agenda, and to initiate cultural and policy reforms to remove perverse research incentives.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale.
1991 · 3.966 Zit.
Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review
2005 · 3.771 Zit.
Radiobiology for the Radiologist.
1974 · 3.501 Zit.
International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound
2012 · 2.813 Zit.
Radiation Dose Associated With Common Computed Tomography Examinations and the Associated Lifetime Attributable Risk of Cancer
2009 · 2.431 Zit.