Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Minimal reporting improvement after peer review in reports of COVID-19 prediction models: systematic review
2022·7 Zitationen·Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen7
Zitationen
11
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
The preprint reporting quality of COVID-19 prediction modeling studies is poor and did not improve much after peer review, suggesting peer review had a trivial effect on the completeness of reporting during the pandemic.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
1915 · 14.195 Zit.
The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis
2015 · 4.311 Zit.
The unpublished manuscript
2018 · 3.243 Zit.
Proceedings of the Academy of natural sciences of Philadelphia
1876 · 3.112 Zit.
Promoting an open research culture
2015 · 2.699 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- St George's, University of London(GB)
- Keele University(GB)
- University of Birmingham(GB)
- University Medical Center Utrecht(NL)
- Utrecht University(NL)
- John Radcliffe Hospital(GB)
- Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre(GB)
- University of Oxford(GB)
- Leiden University Medical Center(NL)
- KU Leuven(BE)
- Maastricht University(NL)
Themen
Academic Publishing and Open AccessArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationSocial Media in Health Education