Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Computational pathology in 2030: a Delphi study forecasting the role of AI in pathology within the next decade
100
Zitationen
28
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly fuelling a fundamental transformation in the practice of pathology. However, clinical integration remains challenging, with no AI algorithms to date in routine adoption within typical anatomic pathology (AP) laboratories. This survey gathered current expert perspectives and expectations regarding the role of AI in AP from those with first-hand computational pathology and AI experience. METHODS: Perspectives were solicited using the Delphi method from 24 subject matter experts between December 2020 and February 2021 regarding the anticipated role of AI in pathology by the year 2030. The study consisted of three consecutive rounds: 1) an open-ended, free response questionnaire generating a list of survey items; 2) a Likert-scale survey scored by experts and analysed for consensus; and 3) a repeat survey of items not reaching consensus to obtain further expert consensus. FINDINGS: Consensus opinions were reached on 141 of 180 survey items (78.3%). Experts agreed that AI would be routinely and impactfully used within AP laboratory and pathologist clinical workflows by 2030. High consensus was reached on 100 items across nine categories encompassing the impact of AI on (1) pathology key performance indicators (KPIs) and (2) the pathology workforce and specific tasks performed by (3) pathologists and (4) AP lab technicians, as well as (5) specific AI applications and their likelihood of routine use by 2030, (6) AI's role in integrated diagnostics, (7) pathology tasks likely to be fully automated using AI, and (8) regulatory/legal and (9) ethical aspects of AI integration in pathology. INTERPRETATION: This systematic consensus study details the expected short-to-mid-term impact of AI on pathology practice. These findings provide timely and relevant information regarding future care delivery in pathology and raise key practical, ethical, and legal challenges that must be addressed prior to AI's successful clinical implementation. FUNDING: No specific funding was provided for this study.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.687 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.591 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.114 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.867 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Autoren
- M. Álvaro Berbís
- David S. McClintock
- Andrey Bychkov
- Jeroen van der Laak
- Liron Pantanowitz
- Jochen K. Lennerz
- Jerome Cheng
- Brett Delahunt
- Lars Egevad
- Catarina Eloy
- Alton B. Farris
- Filippo Fraggetta
- Raimundo García del Moral
- Douglas J. Hartman
- Markus D. Herrmann
- Eva Hollemans
- Kenneth A. Iczkowski
- Aly Karsan
- Mark Kriegsmann
- Mohamed E. Salama
- John H. Sinard
- J. Mark Tuthill
- Bethany Williams
- C. Casado Sánchez
- Víctor Sánchez-Turrión
- Antonio Luna
- José Aneiros‐Fernández
- Jeanne Shen
Institutionen
- Hospital San Juan de Dios(CL)
- Universidad Autónoma de Madrid(ES)
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona(US)
- Kameda Medical Center(JP)
- Radboud University Nijmegen(NL)
- Radboud University Medical Center(NL)
- University of Michigan(US)
- Harvard University(US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital(US)
- University of Otago(NZ)
- Karolinska Institutet(SE)
- Universidade do Porto(PT)
- Emory University(US)
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada(ES)
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center(US)
- Erasmus MC(NL)
- Medical College of Wisconsin(US)
- University of British Columbia(CA)
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre(CA)
- Heidelberg University(DE)
- University Hospital Heidelberg(DE)
- Yale University(US)
- Henry Ford Hospital(US)
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust(GB)
- Hospital Universitario La Paz(ES)
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda(ES)
- Intel (United States)(US)
- Stanford Medicine(US)
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)(CA)
- Stanford University(US)