Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Academic journals cannot simply require authors to declare that they used ChatGPT
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
This correspondence points out the weaknesses of some academic journals' editorial drafts and policies for ChatGPT. The existing editing drafts and policies should specify in more detail which parts of the paper authors can use ChatGPT. If authors use ChatGPT-generated content in the conclusion or results section, it may harm the paper’s originality, which should not be accepted.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.674 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.583 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.105 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.862 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.