Deep learning–based diagnosis of osteoblastic bone metastases and bone islands in computed tomograph images: a multicenter diagnostic study

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model based on CT for differentiating bone islands and osteoblastic bone metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients with sclerosing bone lesions (SBLs) were retrospectively included in three hospitals. The images from site 1 were randomly assigned to the training (70%) and intrinsic verification (10%) datasets for developing the two-dimensional (2D) DL model (single-slice input) and "2.5-dimensional" (2.5D) DL model (three-slice input) and to the internal validation dataset (20%) for evaluating the performance of both models. The diagnostic performance was evaluated using the internal validation set from site 1 and additional external validation datasets from site 2 and site 3. And statistically analyze the performance of 2D and 2.5D DL models. RESULTS: In total, 1918 SBLs in 728 patients in site 1, 122 SBLs in 71 patients in site 2, and 71 SBLs in 47 patients in site 3 were used to develop and test the 2D and 2.5D DL models. The best performance was obtained using the 2.5D DL model, which achieved an AUC of 0.996 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.995-0.996), 0.958 (95% CI, 0.958-0.960), and 0.952 (95% CI, 0.951-0.953) and accuracies of 0.950, 0.902, and 0.863 for the internal validation set, the external validation set from site 2 and site 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: A DL model based on a three-slice CT image input (2.5D DL model) can improve the prediction of osteoblastic bone metastases, which can facilitate clinical decision-making. KEY POINTS: • This study investigated the value of deep learning models in identifying bone islands and osteoblastic bone metastases. • Three-slice CT image input (2.5D DL model) outweighed the 2D model in the classification of sclerosing bone lesions. • The 2.5D deep learning model showed excellent performance using the internal (AUC, 0.996) and two external (AUC, 0.958; AUC, 0.952) validation sets.

Ähnliche Arbeiten