Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Performance of deep learning algorithms to distinguish high-grade glioma from low-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
18
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate deep learning (DL) performance in differentiating low- and high-grade glioma. Search online database for studies continuously published from 1st January 2015 until 16th August 2022. The random-effects model was used for synthesis, based on pooled sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under the curve (AUC). Heterogeneity was estimated using the Higgins inconsistency index (I<sup>2</sup>). 33 were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled SE and SP were 94% and 93%, with an AUC of 0.98. There was great heterogeneity in this field. Our evidence-based study shows DL achieves high accuracy in glioma grading. Subgroup analysis reveals several limitations in this field: 1) Diagnostic trials require standard method for data merging for AI; 2) small sample size; 3) poor-quality image preprocessing; 4) not standard algorithm development; 5) not standard data report; 6) different definition of HGG and LGG; and 7) poor extrapolation.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
2008 · 28.906 Zit.
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
1987 · 16.123 Zit.
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.591 Zit.
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
2011 · 10.770 Zit.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
2010 · 9.110 Zit.