Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Is ChatGPT Ready to Write Scientific Case Reports Independently? A Comparative Evaluation Between Human and Artificial Intelligence
29
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific publishing has gained increased attention, and one AI tool that has been the subject of much discussion is ChatGPT. It is a large language model (LLM) built on the OpenAI platform that aims to emulate human-like writing and continually improves through user interactions. In this paper, ChatGPT's performance was assessed in medical publishing by comparing it to a case report written by oral and maxillofacial radiologists. ChatGPT was tasked with writing a case report based on a drafted report written by the authors in five different prompts. The findings of this study highlight issues related to the accuracy, completeness, and readability of the generated text. These results have significant implications for the future use of AI in scientific publishing and suggest that in the current iteration of ChatGPT, scientific information must be revised by an expert.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.312 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.169 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.564 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.466 Zit.