Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Robotic Arthroplasty Clinical and cost Effectiveness Randomised controlled trial (RACER-knee): a study protocol
17
Zitationen
23
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Robotic-assisted knee replacement systems have been introduced to healthcare services worldwide in an effort to improve clinical outcomes for people, although high-quality evidence that they are clinically, or cost-effective remains sparse. Robotic-arm systems may improve surgical accuracy and could contribute to reduced pain, improved function and lower overall cost of total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. However, TKR with conventional instruments may be just as effective and may be quicker and cheaper. There is a need for a robust evaluation of this technology, including cost-effectiveness analyses using both within-trial and modelling approaches. This trial will compare robotic-assisted against conventional TKR to provide high-quality evidence on whether robotic-assisted knee replacement is beneficial to patients and cost-effective for healthcare systems. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Robotic Arthroplasty Clinical and cost Effectiveness Randomised controlled trial-Knee is a multicentre, participant-assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted TKR compared with TKR using conventional instruments. A total of 332 participants will be randomised (1:1) to provide 90% power for a 12-point difference in the primary outcome measure; the Forgotten Joint Score at 12 months postrandomisation. Allocation concealment will be achieved using computer-based randomisation performed on the day of surgery and methods for blinding will include sham incisions for marker clusters and blinded operation notes. The primary analysis will adhere to the intention-to-treat principle. Results will be reported in line with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement. A parallel study will collect data on the learning effects associated with robotic-arm systems. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by an ethics committee for patient participation (East Midlands-Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee, 29 July 2020. NRES number: 20/EM/0159). All results from the study will be disseminated using peer-reviewed publications, presentations at international conferences, lay summaries and social media as appropriate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN27624068.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030
2007 · 6.888 Zit.
Treatment of Deep Cartilage Defects in the Knee with Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation
1994 · 5.499 Zit.
Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030
2007 · 5.442 Zit.
Rating Systems in the Evaluation of Knee Ligament Injuries
1985 · 4.566 Zit.
Rationale, of The Knee Society Clinical Rating System
1989 · 4.533 Zit.
Autoren
- James M. Griffin
- Edward T. Davis
- Helen Parsons
- Elke Gemperlé Mannion
- Chetan Khatri
- David R Ellard
- Mark Blyth
- Nick D. Clement
- David J. Deehan
- Nicholas Flynn
- Josephine Fox
- Nicholas J. Grant
- Fares S. Haddad
- Charles Hutchinson
- James Mason
- Bishal Mohindru
- Chloe E. H. Scott
- Toby O. Smith
- John Skinner
- Andrew D. Toms
- Sophie Rees
- Martin Underwood
- Andrew Metcalfe
Institutionen
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust(GB)
- University of Warwick(GB)
- Royal Orthopaedic Hospital(GB)
- Glasgow Royal Infirmary(GB)
- Orthopaedic Research(GB)
- Edinburgh Royal Infirmary(GB)
- University of Edinburgh(GB)
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital(GB)
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust(GB)
- Coventry (United Kingdom)(GB)
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust(GB)
- University College London(GB)
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust(GB)
- Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust(GB)
- University of Bristol(GB)