Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Plan Quality Analysis of Automated Treatment Planning Workflow With Commercial Auto-Segmentation Tools and Clinical Knowledge-Based Planning Models for Prostate Cancer
3
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
This study evaluated the feasibility of using artificial intelligence (AI) segmentation software for volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) prostate planning in conjunction with knowledge-based planning to facilitate a fully automated workflow. Two commercially available AI software programs, Radformation AutoContour (Radformation, New York, NY) and Siemens AI-Rad Companion (Siemens Healthineers, Malvern, PA) were used to auto-segment the rectum, bladder, femoral heads, and bowel bag on 30 retrospective clinical cases (10 intact prostate, 10 prostate bed, and 10 prostate and lymph node). Physician-segmented target volumes were transferred to AI structure sets. In-house RapidPlan models were used to generate plans using the original, physician-segmented structure sets as well as Radformation and Siemens AI-generated structure sets. Thus, there were three plans for each of the 30 cases, totaling 90 plans. Following RapidPlan optimization, planning target volume (PTV) coverage was set to 95%. Then, the plans optimized using AI structures were recalculated on the physician structure set with fixed monitor units. In this way, physician contours were used as the gold standard for identifying any clinically relevant differences in dose distributions. One-way analysis of variation (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed across the three sets of plans for intact prostate, prostate bed, or prostate and lymph nodes. The results indicate that an automated volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) prostate planning workflow can consistently achieve high plan quality. However, our results also show that small but consistent differences in contouring preferences may lead to subtle differences in planning results. Therefore, the clinical implementation of auto-contouring should be carefully validated.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
2008 · 28.993 Zit.
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
1987 · 16.123 Zit.
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.699 Zit.
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
2011 · 10.808 Zit.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
2010 · 9.119 Zit.