Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
A comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT consultation quality for augmentation mammoplasty: A comparative analysis between plastic surgeons and laypersons
42
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
Existing health information evaluation tools may not be entirely suitable for comprehensively evaluating the quality of individual responses generated by ChatGPT. Consequently, the development and implementation of appropriate evaluation tools to assess the appropriateness and quality of AI consultations are necessary.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)
2004 · 6.118 Zit.
The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations
2006 · 6.070 Zit.
Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models
2012 · 5.818 Zit.
Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review
2011 · 5.205 Zit.
Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century
2000 · 4.930 Zit.