Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The value of standards for health datasets in artificial intelligence-based applications
239
Zitationen
24
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
Artificial intelligence as a medical device is increasingly being applied to healthcare for diagnosis, risk stratification and resource allocation. However, a growing body of evidence has highlighted the risk of algorithmic bias, which may perpetuate existing health inequity. This problem arises in part because of systemic inequalities in dataset curation, unequal opportunity to participate in research and inequalities of access. This study aims to explore existing standards, frameworks and best practices for ensuring adequate data diversity in health datasets. Exploring the body of existing literature and expert views is an important step towards the development of consensus-based guidelines. The study comprises two parts: a systematic review of existing standards, frameworks and best practices for healthcare datasets; and a survey and thematic analysis of stakeholder views of bias, health equity and best practices for artificial intelligence as a medical device. We found that the need for dataset diversity was well described in literature, and experts generally favored the development of a robust set of guidelines, but there were mixed views about how these could be implemented practically. The outputs of this study will be used to inform the development of standards for transparency of data diversity in health datasets (the STANDING Together initiative).
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.312 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.169 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.564 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.466 Zit.
Autoren
- Anmol Arora
- Joseph Alderman
- Joanne Palmer
- Shaswath Ganapathi
- Elinor Laws
- Melissa D. McCradden
- Lauren Oakden‐Rayner
- Stephen Pfohl
- Marzyeh Ghassemi
- Francis McKay
- Darren Treanor
- Negar Rostamzadeh
- Bilal A. Mateen
- Jacqui Gath
- Adewole O. Adebajo
- Stephanie Kuku
- Rubeta Matin
- Katherine Heller
- Elizabeth Sapey
- Neil J. Sebire
- Heather Cole-Lewis
- Melanie Calvert
- Alastair K. Denniston
- Xiaoxuan Liu
Institutionen
- University of Cambridge(GB)
- University of Birmingham(GB)
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust(GB)
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre(GB)
- Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust(GB)
- Hospital for Sick Children(CA)
- Genome Canada(CA)
- Public Health Ontario(CA)
- University of Adelaide(AU)
- Australian Centre for Robotic Vision(AU)
- Google (United States)(US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology(US)
- Vector Institute(CA)
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities(GB)
- University of Oxford(GB)
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust(GB)
- University of Leeds(GB)
- Linköping University(SE)
- Google (Canada)(CA)
- University College London(GB)
- Wellcome Trust(GB)
- London Women's Clinic(GB)
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust(GB)
- Great Ormond Street Hospital(GB)
- National Institute for Health Research(GB)
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust(GB)
- Moorfields Eye Hospital(GB)