Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparison of ChatGPT versions in informing patients with rotator cuff injuries
6
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
The information provided by the ChatGPT conversational system was evaluated as of high quality, but there were significant shortcomings in terms of reliability due to the lack of citations. Despite the ChatGPT 4.0 version having higher readability scores, both versions were considered difficult to read.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register
2011 · 4.972 Zit.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network
2005 · 4.102 Zit.
Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19
2020 · 3.038 Zit.
Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes
2005 · 2.965 Zit.
DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.
1999 · 2.915 Zit.