Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Assessing ChatGPT’s Potential in HIV Prevention Communication: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Accuracy, Completeness, and Inclusivity
22
Zitationen
26
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
With the advancement of artificial intelligence(AI), platforms like ChatGPT have gained traction in different fields, including Medicine. This study aims to evaluate the potential of ChatGPT in addressing questions related to HIV prevention and to assess its accuracy, completeness, and inclusivity. A team consisting of 15 physicians, six members from HIV communities, and three experts in gender and queer studies designed an assessment of ChatGPT. Queries were categorized into five thematic groups: general HIV information, behaviors increasing HIV acquisition risk, HIV and pregnancy, HIV testing, and the prophylaxis use. A team of medical doctors was in charge of developing questions to be submitted to ChatGPT. The other members critically assessed the generated responses regarding level of expertise, accuracy, completeness, and inclusivity. The median accuracy score was 5.5 out of 6, with 88.4% of responses achieving a score ≥ 5. Completeness had a median of 3 out of 3, while the median for inclusivity was 2 out of 3. Some thematic groups, like behaviors associated with HIV transmission and prophylaxis, exhibited higher accuracy, indicating variable performance across different topics. Issues of inclusivity were identified, notably the use of outdated terms and a lack of representation for some communities. ChatGPT demonstrates significant potential in providing accurate information on HIV-related topics. However, while responses were often scientifically accurate, they sometimes lacked the socio-political context and inclusivity essential for effective health communication. This underlines the importance of aligning AI-driven platforms with contemporary health communication strategies and ensuring the balance of accuracy and inclusivity.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.336 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.207 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.607 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.476 Zit.
Autoren
- Andrea De Vito
- Agnese Colpani
- Giulia Moi
- Sergio Babudieri
- Andrea Calcagno
- Valeria Calvino
- Manuela Ceccarelli
- Gianmaria Colpani
- Gabriella d’Ettorre
- Antonio Di Biagio
- M Farinella
- Marco Falaguasta
- Emanuele Focà
- Giusi Giupponi
- Adriano José Habed
- Wigbertson Julian Isenia
- Sergio Lo Caputo
- Giulia Marchetti
- Luca Modesti
- Cristina Mussini
- Giuseppe Nunnari
- Stefano Rusconi
- Daria Russo
- Annalisa Saracino
- Pier Andrea Serra
- Giordano Madeddu
Institutionen
- University of Sassari(IT)
- University of Turin(IT)
- Lega Italiana per la Lotta ai Tumori(IT)
- Università degli Studi di Enna Kore(IT)
- University of the Arts Utrecht(NL)
- Utrecht University(NL)
- Policlinico Umberto I(IT)
- University of Genoa(IT)
- Ministero della cultura(IT)
- University of Brescia(IT)
- Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia(IT)
- University of Amsterdam(NL)
- University of Foggia(IT)
- Ospedale San Paolo(IT)
- University of Milan(IT)
- University of Modena and Reggio Emilia(IT)
- University of Catania(IT)
- Ospedale Garibaldi(IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Civile di Legnano(IT)
- University of Bari Aldo Moro(IT)