Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Assessment of the information provided by ChatGPT regarding exercise for patients with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study
11
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the feasibility of ChatGPT for patients with type 2 diabetes seeking information about exercise. METHODS: In this pilot study, two physicians with expertise in diabetes care and rehabilitative treatment in Republic of Korea discussed and determined the 14 most asked questions on exercise for managing type 2 diabetes by patients in clinical practice. Each question was inputted into ChatGPT (V.4.0), and the answers from ChatGPT were assessed. The Likert scale was calculated for each category of validity (1-4), safety (1-4) and utility (1-4) based on position statements of the American Diabetes Association and American College of Sports Medicine. RESULTS: Regarding validity, 4 of 14 ChatGPT (28.6%) responses were scored as 3, indicating accurate but incomplete information. The other 10 responses (71.4%) were scored as 4, indicating complete accuracy with complete information. Safety and utility scored 4 (no danger and completely useful) for all 14 ChatGPT responses. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT can be used as supplementary educational material for diabetic exercise. However, users should be aware that ChatGPT may provide incomplete answers to some questions on exercise for type 2 diabetes.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.663 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.576 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.091 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.859 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.