Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Exploring decision-makers’ challenges and strategies when selecting multiple systematic reviews: insights for AI decision support tools in healthcare
6
Zitationen
15
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Given the identified barriers of using SR evidence, an AI tool to facilitate comparison of the relevance of SRs, the search and methodological quality, could help users efficiently choose among SRs and make healthcare decisions.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 86.674 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.871 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.202 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.009 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.694 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- McGill University Health Centre(CA)
- Nova Scotia Health Authority(CA)
- Digital China Health (China)(CN)
- University of Bologna(IT)
- University of British Columbia(CA)
- Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane(DE)
- Ottawa Hospital(CA)
- University of Ottawa(CA)
- St. Michael's Hospital(CA)
- University of Toronto(CA)
- Toronto Metropolitan University(CA)