Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Inconsistent advice by ChatGPT influences decision making in various areas
5
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
The ChatGPT technology is increasingly becoming a part of our daily lives and is starting to be utilized in various decision-making contexts. The current study builds upon prior research, demonstrating that people's moral decision-making is influenced by ChatGPT across three perspectives, as evidenced by two studies (total n = 1925). The findings suggested that ChatGPT advice impacted decision-making similarly to expert advice, although not all decisions were susceptible to influence, particularly those based on negative emotions. Additionally, ChatGPT advice affected decisions beyond moral judgments, but no effect was observed when the advice recommended immediate low rewards. Moreover, individuals with a higher tendency for personal fear of invalidity were more likely to be influenced by both expert and AI advice, but this was not related to trust in AI.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
2001 · 7.781 Zit.
Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations
1982 · 7.743 Zit.
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.
1995 · 6.286 Zit.
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.
1955 · 4.685 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.575 Zit.