A survey analysis of the adoption of large language models among pathologists

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the adoption and perception of large language model (LLM) applications among pathologists. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted, gathering data from pathologists on their usage and views concerning LLM tools. The survey, distributed globally through various digital platforms, included quantitative and qualitative questions. Patterns in the respondents' adoption and perspectives on these artificial intelligence tools were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 215 respondents, 100 (46.5%) reported using LLMs, particularly ChatGPT (OpenAI), for professional purposes, predominantly for information retrieval, proofreading, academic writing, and drafting pathology reports, highlighting a significant time-saving benefit. Academic pathologists demonstrated a better level of understanding of LLMs than their peers. Although chatbots sometimes provided incorrect general domain information, they were considered moderately proficient concerning pathology-specific knowledge. The technology was mainly used for drafting educational materials and programming tasks. The most sought-after feature in LLMs was their image analysis capabilities. Participants expressed concerns about information accuracy, privacy, and the need for regulatory approval. CONCLUSIONS: Large language model applications are gaining notable acceptance among pathologists, with nearly half of respondents indicating adoption less than a year after the tools' introduction to the market. They see the benefits but are also worried about these tools' reliability, ethical implications, and security.

Ähnliche Arbeiten