Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Accuracy of ChatGPT3.5 in answering clinical questions on guidelines for severe acute pancreatitis
3
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Guidelines must be interpreted comprehensively and correctly to standardize the clinical process. However, this process is challenging and requires interpreters to have a medical background and qualifications. In this study, the accuracy of ChatGPT3.5 in answering clinical questions related to the 2019 guidelines for severe acute pancreatitis was evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: An observational study was conducted using the 2019 guidelines for severe acute pancreatitis. The study compared the accuracy of ChatGPT3.5 in English versus Chinese and found that it was more accurate in English (71%) than in Chinese (59%) (P value: 0.203). Additionally, the study assessed the accuracy of ChatGPT3.5 in answering short-answer questions versus true/false questions and found that it was more accurate in answering short-answer questions (76%) than in answering true/false questions (60%) (P value: 0.405). CONCLUSIONS: For clinicians managing severe acute pancreatitis, ChatGPT3.5 may have potential value. However, it should not be relied upon excessively for clinical decision making.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.786 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.700 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.270 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.908 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.