Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Machine Learning for Patient-Based Real-Time Quality Control (PBRTQC), Analytical and Preanalytical Error Detection in Clinical Laboratory
10
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
The rapidly evolving field of machine learning (ML), along with artificial intelligence in a broad sense, is revolutionising many areas of healthcare, including laboratory medicine. The amalgamation of the fields of ML and patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) processes could improve the traditional PBRTQC and error detection algorithms in the laboratory. This narrative review discusses published studies on using ML for the detection of systematic errors, non-systematic errors, and combinations of different types of errors in clinical laboratories. The studies discussed used ML for detecting bias, the requirement for re-calibration, samples contaminated with intravenous fluid or EDTA, delayed sample analysis, wrong-blood-in-tube errors, interference or a combination of different types of errors, by comparing the performance of ML models with human validators or traditional PBRTQC algorithms. Advantages, limitations, the creation of standardised ML models, ethical and regulatory aspects and potential future developments have also been discussed in brief.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
1986 · 47.328 Zit.
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
1982 · 21.600 Zit.
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
2011 · 13.740 Zit.
Basic principles of ROC analysis
1978 · 6.044 Zit.
All About Albumin: Biochemistry, Genetics, and Medical Applications
1995 · 3.103 Zit.