Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
A use case of ChatGPT: summary of an expert panel discussion on electronic health records and implementation science
1
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing healthcare, but less is known about how it may facilitate methodological innovations in research settings. In this manuscript, we describe a novel use of AI in summarizing and reporting qualitative data generated from an expert panel discussion about the role of electronic health records (EHRs) in implementation science. Materials and methods: 15 implementation scientists participated in an hour-long expert panel discussion addressing how EHRs can support implementation strategies, measure implementation outcomes, and influence implementation science. Notes from the discussion were synthesized by ChatGPT (a large language model-LLM) to generate a manuscript summarizing the discussion, which was later revised by participants. We also surveyed participants on their experience with the process. Results: Panelists identified implementation strategies and outcome measures that can be readily supported by EHRs and noted that implementation science will need to evolve to assess future EHR advancements. The ChatGPT-generated summary of the panel discussion was generally regarded as an efficient means to offer a high-level overview of the discussion, although participants felt it lacked nuance and context. Extensive editing was required to contextualize the LLM-generated text and situate it in relevant literature. Discussion and conclusions: Our qualitative findings highlight the central role EHRs can play in supporting implementation science, which may require additional informatics and implementation expertise and a different way to think about the combined fields. Our experience using ChatGPT as a research methods innovation was mixed and underscores the need for close supervision and attentive human involvement.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
2007 · 40.733 Zit.
Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews
2016 · 23.959 Zit.
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
2019 · 16.559 Zit.
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
2008 · 15.896 Zit.
Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science
2009 · 14.650 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center(US)
- VA New England Healthcare System(US)
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior(US)
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System(US)
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System(US)
- Center for Innovation(US)
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center(US)
- Baylor College of Medicine(US)
- San Francisco VA Medical Center(US)
- University of California, San Francisco(US)
- Quality Enhancement Research Initiative(US)
- University of California, Davis(US)
- Duke University(US)
- Durham VA Health Care System(US)