Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
How can artificial intelligence help improve patients' rehabilitation with coronary artery bypass grafting?
0
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the most common procedures used to treat patients with severe blockages in the heart's arteries, and it typically requires careful post-operative care and rehabilitation [1]. Following such a complex surgery, the rehabilitation process involves managing numerous factors, including monitoring cardiac status, controlling vital signs, improving heart and lung function, and addressing the patient's mental and emotional well-being. AI can be crucial in accelerating and enhancing this process [2]. One of the most critical applications of AI in rehabilitating patients’ post-CABG surgery is its ability to continuously monitor and analyze medical data [3]. Wearable devices and intelligent monitoring systems, supported by AI, consistently track vital signs such as heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen levels. These systems can detect abnormalities and promptly alert the medical team, preventing severe complications before the patient’s condition worsens [3]. This continuous, uninterrupted monitoring allows patients to be supervised even in their homes, reducing the burden on hospitals and improving the overall patient experience. In addition, AI can play a crucial role in creating personalized rehabilitation programs for patients. By utilizing machine learning algorithms, AI can analyze detailed data related to each patient and tailor rehabilitation and exercise programs according to their specific needs. For example, some patients may require lighter exercise routines, while others may be able to engage in more complex physical activities. AI, by analyzing physiological data and the medical history of patients, can recommend rehabilitation programs suited to their condition while also minimizing potential risks [4, 5]
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The CES-D Scale
1977 · 52.898 Zit.
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
1983 · 46.027 Zit.
The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
2002 · 9.679 Zit.
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
2020 · 9.238 Zit.
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
2019 · 8.933 Zit.