Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Using human factors methods to mitigate bias in artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support
6
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract Objectives To highlight the often overlooked role of user interface (UI) design in mitigating bias in artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support (CDS). Materials and Methods This perspective paper discusses the interdependency between AI-based algorithm development and UI design and proposes strategies for increasing the safety and efficacy of CDS. Results The role of design in biasing user behavior is well documented in behavioral economics and other disciplines. We offer an example of how UI designs play a role in how bias manifests in our machine learning-based CDS development. Discussion Much discussion on bias in AI revolves around data quality and algorithm design; less attention is given to how UI design can exacerbate or mitigate limitations of AI-based applications. Conclusion This work highlights important considerations including the role of UI design in reinforcing/mitigating bias, human factors methods for identifying issues before an application is released, and risk communication strategies.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.700 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.605 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.133 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.873 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.