Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Racial Bias in Clinical and Population Health Algorithms: A Critical Review of Current Debates
16
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Among health care researchers, there is increasing debate over how best to assess and ensure the fairness of algorithms used for clinical decision support and population health, particularly concerning potential racial bias. Here we first distill concerns over the fairness of health care algorithms into four broad categories: (<i>a</i>) the explicit inclusion (or, conversely, the exclusion) of race and ethnicity in algorithms, (<i>b</i>) unequal algorithm decision rates across groups, (<i>c</i>) unequal error rates across groups, and (<i>d</i>) potential bias in the target variable used in prediction. With this taxonomy, we critically examine seven prominent and controversial health care algorithms. We show that popular approaches that aim to improve the fairness of health care algorithms can in fact worsen outcomes for individuals across all racial and ethnic groups. We conclude by offering an alternative, consequentialist framework for algorithm design that mitigates these harms by instead foregrounding outcomes and clarifying trade-offs in the pursuit of equitable decision-making.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
2011 · 33.567 Zit.
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
2020 · 18.458 Zit.
To Err Is Human
2000 · 14.073 Zit.
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
2007 · 9.511 Zit.
KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease
2024 · 6.769 Zit.