AI bias in lung cancer radiotherapy

Abstract

In lung cancer research, AI has been trained to read chest radiographs, which has led to improved health outcomes. However, the use of AI in healthcare settings is not without its own set of drawbacks, with bias being primary among them. This study seeks to investigate AI bias in diagnosing and treating lung cancer patients. The research objectives of this study are threefold: 1) To determine which features of patient datasets are most susceptible to AI bias; 2) to then measure the extent of such bias; and 3) from the findings generated, offer recommendations for overcoming the pitfalls of AI in lung cancer therapy for the delivery of more accurate and equitable healthcare. We created a synthetic database consisting of 50 lung cancer patients using a large language model (LLM). We then used a logistic regression model to detect bias in AI-informed treatment plans. The empirical results from our synthetic patient data illustrate AI bias along the lines of (1) patient demographics (specifically, age) and (2) disease classification/histology. As it concerns patient age, the model exhibited an accuracy rate of 82.7% for patients < 60 years compared to 85.7% for patients ≥ 60 years. Regarding disease type, the model was less adept in identifying treatment categories for adenocarcinoma (accuracy rate: 83.7%) than it was in predicting treatment categories for squamous cell carcinoma (accuracy rate: 92.3%). We address the implications of such results in terms of how they may exacerbate existing health disparities for certain patient populations. We conclude by outlining several strategies for addressing AI bias, including generating a more robust training dataset, developing software tools to detect bias, making the model’s code open access and soliciting user feedback, inviting oversight from an ethics review board, and augmenting patient datasets by synthesizing the underrepresented data.

Ähnliche Arbeiten