Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Generating credible referenced medical research: A comparative study of openAI's GPT-4 and Google's gemini
31
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
While Gemini demonstrates significantly superior performance in generating credible and accurate references for medical research introductions, both models produced fabricated evidence, limiting their reliability for reference searching. This snapshot comparison of two prominent AI models highlights the potential and limitations of AI in academic content creation. The findings underscore the critical need for verification of AI-generated academic content and call for ongoing research into evolving AI models and their applications in scientific writing.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.336 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.207 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.607 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.476 Zit.