Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Trust in science, trust in ChatGPT? How Germans think about generative AI as a source in science communication
14
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Generative AI like ChatGPT has been diagnosed to fundamentally impact different realms of life. This includes science communication, where GenAI tools are becoming important sources of science-related content for many people. This raises the question of whether people trust GenAI as a source in this field, a question that has not been answered sufficiently yet. Adapting a model developed by Roberts et al. [2013] and utilizing survey data from the German Science Barometer 2023, we find that Germans are rather sceptical about and do not strongly trust GenAI in science communication. Structural equation modelling shows that respondents' trust in GenAI as a source in science communication is driven strongly by their general trust in science, which is largely driven by their knowledge about science and the perception that science improves quality of life.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The spread of true and false news online
2018 · 8.125 Zit.
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
2010 · 6.667 Zit.
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
2017 · 6.440 Zit.
Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception
1983 · 6.271 Zit.
The Matthew Effect in Science
1968 · 6.182 Zit.