OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 10.05.2026, 01:56

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

The Effects of Presenting AI Uncertainty Information on Pharmacists’ Trust in Automated Pill Recognition Technology: Exploratory Mixed Subjects Study

2024·6 Zitationen·JMIR Human FactorsOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

6

Zitationen

9

Autoren

2024

Jahr

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dispensing errors significantly contribute to adverse drug events, resulting in substantial health care costs and patient harm. Automated pill verification technologies have been developed to aid pharmacists with medication dispensing. However, pharmacists' trust in such automated technologies remains unexplored. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate pharmacists' trust in automated pill verification technology designed to support medication dispensing. METHODS: Thirty licensed pharmacists in the United States performed a web-based simulated pill verification task to determine whether an image of a filled medication bottle matched a known reference image. Participants completed a block of 100 verification trials without any help, and another block of 100 trials with the help of an imperfect artificial intelligence (AI) aid recommending acceptance or rejection of a filled medication bottle. The experiment used a mixed subjects design. The between-subjects factor was the AI aid type, with or without an AI uncertainty plot. The within-subjects factor was the four potential verification outcomes: (1) the AI rejects the incorrect drug, (2) the AI rejects the correct drug, (3) the AI approves the incorrect drug, and (4) the AI approves the correct drug. Participants' trust in the AI system was measured. Mixed model (generalized linear models) tests were conducted with 2-tailed t tests to compare the means between the 2 AI aid types for each verification outcome. RESULTS: =-3.96; P<.001). A pronounced "negativity bias" was observed, where the degree of trust reduction when the AI made an error exceeded the trust gain when the AI made a correct decision (z=-11.30; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first attempt to examine pharmacists' trust in automated pill verification technology. Our findings reveal that pharmacists have a favorable disposition toward trusting automation. Moreover, providing uncertainty information about the AI's recommendation significantly boosts pharmacists' trust in AI aid, highlighting the importance of developing transparent AI systems within health care.

Ähnliche Arbeiten