Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Examining Artificial Intelligence Policies in Counsellor Education
4
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
ABSTRACT Aims This study investigated counsellor education Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) programs generative artificial intelligence (AI) policies in doctoral‐level counselor education programs. We aimed to contribute to emerging research on the use of generative AI within counselor education. Methods A content analysis of the policies was conducted along with a linguistic analysis of the policies to determine the authenticity, tone, and analytical nature of the University, and program policies. Results A content analysis of generative artificial intelligence usage policies within doctoral counselor education programs indicated that only five programs had program‐specific generative artificial intelligence policies. Most programs utilized University policies or usage guidance. Conclusion Suggestions for practice include providing definitional clarity of the different types of AI to reduce potential frustration for learners. Further, programs should consider developing a program‐specific policy since the counseling profession requires a high level of ethical responsibility to best serve clients.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods
2009 · 5.678 Zit.
The Stress Process
1981 · 4.447 Zit.
Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak
2020 · 2.789 Zit.
Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves
2002 · 2.545 Zit.
Emotion: A Psychoevolutionary Synthesis
1980 · 2.523 Zit.