Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Gemini; Implications for Junior High School Physics Education: Opportunities and Ethical Challenges
6
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming education, offering tools that promise enhanced engagement and understanding for students and teachers alike. This study examines the educational potential of Google’s Gemini in comparison with OpenAI’s ChatGPT, focusing on junior high school physics education. By using hydrostatic pressure and fractal theory as a case study, both platforms were evaluated based on their ability to generate accurate lesson plans, identify and address misconceptions, and adapt to diverse educational needs. ChatGPT excelled in addressing student misconceptions and providing detailed visual aids, fostering a deeper understanding of the topic. Gemini’s multimodal capabilities demonstrated promise in integrating various media but highlighted challenges in conceptual depth and accuracy. This analysis underscores the need for critical evaluation of AI tools to optimize their implementation in educational settings, ensuring they complement rather than replace traditional teaching methods.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.339 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.211 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.614 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.478 Zit.