Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Assessing readability of explanations and reliability of answers by GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in non-traumatic spinal cord injury education
4
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
PURPOSE: Our study aimed to: i) Assess the readability of textbook explanations using established indexes; ii) Compare these with GPT-4's default explanations, ensuring similar word counts for direct comparisons; iii) Evaluate GPT-4's adaptability by simplifying high-complexity explanations; iv) Determine the reliability of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in providing accurate answers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We utilized a textbook designed for ABPMR certification. Our analysis covered 50 multiple-choice questions, each with a detailed explanation, focusing on non-traumatic spinal cord injury (NTSCI). RESULTS: = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed GPT-4's potential in medical education by providing highly accurate yet often complex explanations for NTSCI, which were successfully simplified without losing accuracy.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.740 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.649 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.202 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.886 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.