Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Navigating the integration of generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Opportunities, challenges, and strategies for fostering ethical learning
3
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
The dynamic nature of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered tools poses a unique challenge owing to the continuous evolution and rapid development of technology. AI refers to the simulation of human intelligence using computational systems. It may present opportunities and challenges in the education system, particularly for higher education institutions, where teaching students about the key concepts of discipline for professional training and learning is essential. With AI, particularly generative AI (Gen AI), incorporated into future healthcare practices, whether higher education should incorporate AI into the classroom, remains an active worldwide research topic. Gen AI has transformed education by producing new data based on user prompts and existing data with a defined training set, such as Internet-accessible information. Gen AI supplies systems with reasoning, allowing them to learn from experience, adjust to new inputs, and perform human-like tasks. The application of Gen AI poses a unique challenge in terms of how students perceive and use these tools. Healthcare disciplines such as medicine assessment could be accomplished and cleared using chat generative pretrained transformer (ChatGPT) [1-3]. A relevant approach is required to help educators navigate this evolving landscape and foster an environment. In the United States, different teaching and research institutions are attempting to find an approach that allows communication, sets expectations, and cultivates originality and learning skills. Moreover, a need exists to set clear expectations for the use of AI-generated text through course communication to raise the awareness of AI-generated learning policies. The challenge for students using Gen AI is that course policies often differ with multiple courses taught in a curriculum, leading to confusion, plagiarism, academic dishonesty, and establishing a culture of AI tools as a shortcut, thereby hindering growth and intellectual challenges intrinsic to the learning journey. Plagiarism and academic dishonesty are the most significant concerns of students when using Gen AI ChatGPT to complete written assignments and solve homework assignments, such as calculations. Research papers can be written to reduce the value of learning and to improve academic integrity. From an educator’s perspective, AI-based tools aid in developing assignments with elements that include course content, such as the design of learning activities, lesson plans, class projects, and discussions, thereby exploring the potential of AI-based tools in education to enhance the learning experience and encourage critical thinking with digital literacy, information creditability, and effective communication. Gen AI tools, including large language models, perform various tasks that provide opportunities for educational practice [4]. Gen AI in education can enhance learning; generate automated content and feedback; and modify assessments, adaptive learning analytics, and interfaces, thereby supporting teaching and learning in higher education [5]. With technological advancements, educators should identify opportunities to help students learn in new ways. Educators and students should be informed of the developments in Gen AI and commit to ongoing research and discussions on best practices in response to AI. Future developments in AI are difficult to predict. Numerous studies have shared opportunities to use Gen AI but have cautioned about its limitations, shortcomings, and ethical implications [4,6]. With the increasing use of AI-generated text, educators and students may become dependent on AI to prepare assignments, preventing them from developing critical thinking, writing, and problem-solving skills. This can affect long-term learning and comprehension. The excessive use of AI-generated content without understanding the underlying material can lead to shallow learning. Understanding the key concepts or developing the analytical skills necessary for academic and professional success will face challenges from both educator and student perspectives. With the evolution of Gen AI technology, raising awareness among students and educators about the use of AI tools to help mitigate misuse is crucial. Institutions must introduce AI literacy training programs to students and educators to explain the benefits and ethical risks of Gen AI. Emphasizing the importance of complementing AI with learning is essential. In the United States, universities are increasingly employing AI-based detection tools to identify AI-generated texts. These tools help educators maintain academic integrity by flagging suspicious submissions. Combining these tools with manual checks and plagiarism detection is essential for ensuring authenticity. Transitioning from traditional testing methods, such as essays or examinations that AI can generate, to exploring project-based assessments or oral presentations may encourage students to engage in their learning. Gen AI should be used to enhance understanding. For instance, it can provide personalized feedback, suggest learning resources, or aid in brainstorming ideas. Using AI properly and within limits can enhance the educational experience without replacing students’ efforts. Finally, educators require continuous education to effectively incorporate AI tools into their classrooms. This could involve adapting course materials to use AI-driven resources for better engagement and learning outcomes while setting clear boundaries on what constitutes academic dishonesty. CONCLUSION The integration of AI, particularly Gen AI, into education, presents opportunities and challenges, specifically in higher education. Gen AI can simulate human intelligence, generate data based on user prompts, and perform complex tasks, offering tools to enhance teaching, learning, and critical thinking. However, its application raises concerns about academic integrity, plagiarism, and over-reliance on AI, which may hinder the development of essential skills such as critical thinking and problem-solving. Educators are encouraged to balance the leveraging of AI tools for tasks such as creating lesson plans, assignments, and adaptive learning analytics to foster originality and deep learning. The ongoing evolution of Gen AI demands continuous research, discussion, and adaptation to ensure that its benefits are maximized while addressing its limitations and ethical implications. Author’s contribution The author was the sole contributor to the conception, design, and writing of this manuscript. The author is responsible for the scientific content and integrity of this study. Financial support and sponsorship Not applicable. Conflict of interests No conflict of interests declared.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.349 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.219 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.631 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.480 Zit.