Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
AI-ECG Supported Decision-Making for Coronary Angiography in Acute Chest Pain: The QCG-AID Study
0
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
This pilot study evaluates an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted electrocardiography (ECG) analysis system, QCG, to enhance urgent coronary angiography (CAG) decision-making for acute chest pain in the emergency department (ED). We retrospectively analyzed 300 ED cases, categorized as non-coronary chest pain (Group 1), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without occlusive coronary artery disease (CAD) (Group 2), and ACS with occlusive CAD (Group 3). Six clinicians made urgent CAG decision using a conventional approach (clinical data and ECG) and a QCG-assisted approach (including QCG scores). The QCG-assisted approach improved correct CAG decisions in Group 2 (36.0% vs. 45.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.003) and Group 3 (85.3% vs. 90.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.017), with minimal impact in Group 1 (92.7% vs. 95.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.125). Diagnostic accuracy for ACS improved from 77% to 81% with QCG assistance and reached 82% with QCG alone, supporting AI's potential to enhance urgent CAG decision-making for ED chest pain cases.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
1997 · 55.447 Zit.
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
1986 · 47.302 Zit.
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
2002 · 36.262 Zit.
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
2009 · 27.740 Zit.
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)
2016 · 27.215 Zit.