Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Accuracy of artificial intelligence-based segmentation in maxillofacial structures: a systematic review
29
Zitationen
9
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in the segmentation of teeth, jawbone (maxilla, mandible with temporomandibular joint), and mandibular (inferior alveolar) canal in CBCT and CT scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Articles were retrieved from MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies were analyzed thematically, and their quality was appraised using the JBI checklist for diagnostic test accuracy studies. Meta-analysis was conducted for key performance metrics, including Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Average Surface Distance (ASD). RESULTS: A total of 767 non-duplicate articles were identified, and 30 studies were included in the review. Of these, 27 employed deep-learning models, while 3 utilized classical machine-learning approaches. The pooled DSC for mandible segmentation was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.98), mandibular canal segmentation was 0.694 (95% CI: 0.551-0.838), maxilla segmentation was 0.907 (95% CI: 0.867-0.948), and teeth segmentation was 0.925 (95% CI: 0.891-0.959). Pooled ASD values were 0.534 mm (95% CI: 0.366-0.703) for the mandibular canal, 0.468 mm (95% CI: 0.295-0.641) for the maxilla, and 0.189 mm (95% CI: 0.043-0.335) for teeth. Other metrics, such as sensitivity and precision, were variably reported, with sensitivity exceeding 90% across studies. CONCLUSION: AI-based segmentation, particularly using deep-learning models, demonstrates high accuracy in the segmentation of dental and maxillofacial structures, comparable to expert manual segmentation. The integration of AI into clinical workflows offers not only accuracy but also substantial time savings, positioning it as a promising tool for automated dental imaging.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.
1986 · 3.692 Zit.
The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems
1967 · 3.660 Zit.
The burden of oral disease: challenges to improving oral health in the 21st century.
2005 · 3.579 Zit.
Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition
2018 · 3.113 Zit.
Periodontitis: Consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri‐Implant Diseases and Conditions
2018 · 3.104 Zit.