Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Using artificial intelligence for systematic review: the example of elicit
38
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Our findings suggest that AI research assistants, like Elicit, can serve as valuable complementary tools for researchers when designing or writing systematic reviews. However, AI tools have several limitations and should be used with caution. When using AI tools, certain principles must be followed to maintain methodological rigour and integrity. Improving the performance of AI tools such as Elicit and contributing to the development of guidelines for their use during the systematic review process will enhance their effectiveness.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.316 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.177 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.575 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.468 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Inserm(FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon(FR)
- Laboratoire de recherches Intégratives en Neurosciences et psychologie Cognitive(FR)
- Université Marie et Louis Pasteur(FR)
- Université de franche-comté(FR)
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal(CA)
- Université de Montréal(CA)
- Institut Pasteur(FR)
- French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network(FR)