Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Pharmacy faculty and students perceptions of artificial intelligence: A National Survey
11
Zitationen
22
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study explores the perceptions, familiarity, and utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) among pharmacy faculty and students across the United States. By identifying key gaps in AI education and training, it highlights the need for structured curricular integration to prepare future pharmacists for an evolving digital healthcare landscape. METHODS: A 19-item Qualtrics™ survey was created to assess perceptions of AI use among pharmacy faculty and students and distributed utilizing publicly available contacts at schools of pharmacy and intern lists. The electronic survey was open from September 5th to November 22nd 2023. Responses were analyzed for trends and compared between faculty and student responses across four sub-domains. RESULTS: A total of 235 pharmacy faculty and 405 pharmacy students completed the survey. Responses indicated high familiarity with AI in both groups but found differences in training. Both groups identified ethical considerations and training as major barriers to AI integration. Faculty were less likely to trust AI responses than students despite reporting similar rates of incorrect information. Students were more concerned than faculty about AI reducing pharmacy jobs, particularly in community and health-system settings. DISCUSSION: This study highlights the need for intentional AI training tailored to pharmacy students, aiming to bridge the knowledge gap and equip them with the skills to navigate an AI-driven future. The inconsistency in how AI is addressed within the curriculum and the lack of established ethical guidelines display the need for clear and consistent institutional policies and professional guidance.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.687 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.591 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.114 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.867 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Autoren
- Kyle A Gustafson
- Sarah Berman
- Paul Gavaza
- Islam Mohamed
- Radhika Devraj
- May H. Abdel Aziz
- Divita Singh
- Robin Southwood
- Motolani E. Ogunsanya
- Angela Chu
- Vivek S. Dave
- Jarred Prudencio
- Faria Munir
- Trager D Hintze
- Casey Rowe
- Allison Bernknopf
- Damianne Brand
- Alexander Hoffman
- Ellen Jones
- Victoria Miller
- Anna Nogid
- Leanne Showman
Institutionen
- Northeast Ohio Medical University(US)
- University of the Incarnate Word(US)
- Loma Linda University(US)
- California Northstate University(US)
- Southern Illinois University Edwardsville(US)
- The University of Texas at Tyler(US)
- Temple University(US)
- University of Georgia(US)
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center(US)
- Roseman University of Health Sciences(US)
- St. John Fisher College(US)
- University of Hawaii at Hilo(US)
- University of Illinois Chicago(US)
- Walmart (United States)(US)
- University of Central Florida(US)
- Ferris State University(US)
- Washington State University(US)
- Harding University Main Campus(US)
- University of Louisiana at Monroe(US)
- Fairleigh Dickinson University(US)
- Southwestern Oklahoma State University(US)