Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Ethical considerations in AI-based user profiling for knowledge management: A critical review
9
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
• Privacy 27.9 % and algorithmic bias 25.6 % emerged as the main ethical concerns in KMS. • Five major sources of bias identified in the study. • Introduces "Ethical AI Feedback Loop" framework for continuous monitoring. • Proposes "Ethical Debt" to quantify and manage long-term ethical implications in KM. • Only 28 % of reviewed frameworks offer practical strategies. Artificial Intelligence (AI) enhances knowledge management systems by improving efficiency and personalization, but its rapid adoption raises ethical concerns. This study examines the ethical considerations in AI-based user profiling for knowledge management systems, with a focus on academic environments. The review employed thematic analysis to summarize existing research on ethical challenges and proposed new ways to integrate ethical considerations into AI-driven knowledge management systems. The review analysed 102 peer-reviewed articles published between 2020 and 2024 from major scientific databases such as IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and Scopus. The findings show that privacy 27.9 % and algorithmic bias 25.6 % had major ethical concerns revealing disparities between theoretical frameworks and implementable solutions. Five key bias sources were also identified: data deficiencies, demographic homogeneity, spurious correlations, improper comparators, and cognitive biases. While 73 % of the reviewed frameworks acknowledge at least one ethical consideration, only 28 % propose practical strategies to address them. Some promising approaches include explainable AI techniques, privacy-preserving algorithms, and fairness-aware machine learning. However, there are still gaps in addressing the long-term societal impacts. The study recommends the implementation of an Ethical AI Feedback Loop (EAFL) system, which continuously monitors, evaluates, and adjusts user profiling algorithms based on predefined ethical metrics. Additionally, the study introduces the concept of "Ethical Debt" to quantify and manage the long-term ethical implications. These innovative approaches aim to integrate ethical considerations directly into AI-based knowledge management systems, promoting responsible and adaptable user profiling practices.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.711 Zit.
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
2016 · 3.884 Zit.
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
2004 · 3.506 Zit.
Fairness through awareness
2012 · 3.301 Zit.
AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations
2018 · 3.193 Zit.